The Universe is fundamentally a Quantum Computer

Quantum mechanics gets real - future quantum mechanics theory and research - 75th Anniversary Supplement
Science News , March 1, 1997 by David Lindley

* Share
o Email
o Digg
o Facebook
o Twitter
o Google
o Delicious
o StumbleUpon
o Newsvine
o LinkedIn
o My Yahoo
o Technorati
o Reddit
* Print
* Recommend0

Writing to Niels Bohr in 1935, physicist Erwin Schrodinger lamented his inability to understand a principle that Bohr deemed essential to the interpretation of quantum mechanics: "It must belong to your deepest conviction-and I cannot understand on what you base it," Schrodinger complained.

Bohr's principle concerns the way in which a measurement of a quantum mechanical system-the position of an electron, for example-produces a specific result. Quantum mechanics requires that a system exist in a range of possible states, a superposition, until a measurement is made, at which point one of those states takes on a definite reality. But how?
Most RecentTechnology Articles

* Tech Firms Become Conglomerates ... Unsuccessfully
* Gartner's Take On IT Spending -- Companies Scale Back
* SAP Getting Agile And Mobile
* Amazon Settles Suit with Toys "R" Us for $51 Million
* More »

To illustrate his perplexity, Schrodinger imagined placing a cat in a closed box, along with an atom that could be in one of two states and a device to measure its state. If the measurement goes one way, the cat stays alive; if it goes the other way, the unfortunate cat dies. The quantum system starts as a superposition of two possible states, Schrodinger noted, but does that mean that the cat is simultaneously dead and alive? If not, what is it about a cat that requires it to be dead or alive rather than some unimaginable combination of the two?

Last year, scientists at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in Boulder, Colo., created a small-scale scenario resembling the box with the fanciful cat. They trapped a single atom in such a way that it could occupy either of two distinct states. Then, using lasers, they nudged the two states in opposite directions, physically separating the two halves of the superposition.

Great precision was needed to maintain coherence between the separated states. Even the tiniest disturbance could have upset the system, forcing the atom to take up a definite position in one place or the other. Theoretical investigations in recent years suggest that the delicacy of such states holds an explanation for why atomic superpositions-let alone superpositions of cats-are not normally seen.

The atoms of a real purring, yowling, or napping cat constantly jiggle around, preventing a quantum mechanically coherent state from encompassing the entire animal, except perhaps for an instant. Moreover, the aliveness or deadness of a cat are qualities that have durable meaning, even though the cat's internal quantum disposition is in a perpetual state of flux.

These insights have been mathematically refined to form the basis of a physical process called decoherence. According to its proponents, decoherence confers long-term stability only on those properties of a macroscopic system that correspond to what an observer would recognize. A cat, in other words, remains dead or alive long enough for that state to be recorded; a superposed dead-and-alive cat, however, can never exist long enough to be noticed.

In a broad way, says Wojciech H. Zurek of Los Alamos (N.M.) National Laboratory, decoherence vindicates Bohr's "brilliant stroke of reasoning" in concluding that measurement-an act of noticing-must somehow impose stability on quantum systems. Bohr may not have altogether liked the idea of decoherence, adds Zurek, because it fails to provide the absolute definition of classical behavior that Bohr would have wanted. As last year's NIST experiment shows, single atoms can sometimes behave in a quantum mechanical way, as well as in the classical style that most experiments portray.

Not everyone agrees that these new ideas resolve Schrodinger's long-standing perplexity. Decoherence may explain why observable states are classical states, but it nevertheless leaves open a range of possibilities. "It says you'll never get any wrong answers, but it still doesn't say how you get an answer at all," contends Anthony J. Leggett of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Leggett believes that as experimenters construct increasingly large quantum mechanically coherent systems, they may find discrepancies indicating flaws in quantum mechanics itself.

Zurek responds that arguments over the value of decoherence may result in part from disagreement as to what questions physics should ultimately answer. Applied to the universe as a whole, decoherence limits the possible cosmic histories, or series of events constituting the universe's evolution, to those consistent with the laws of classical physics. This screening may not be useful, he says, for anyone who wants to know why the universe is the way it is, but it may be comforting to know that the universe we perceive is explicable by the laws of physics.

Quandaries of this sort arise largely because of the dichotomy between intuitive thinking and the way quantum mechanics works, says Andreas J. Albrecht of Imperial College in London, "but I have yet to see that amazement translated into practical questions." He suggests that speculation about quantum computers-much discussed but so far unrealized-can usefully illuminate the inner workings of quantum mechanics.

The bits of a quantum computer would be superpositions of quantum states rather than strictly defined binary states. A computation proceeds as an interaction of superposed states, yielding an answer in response to a measurement. Although quantum computers remain "far-fetched" for now, says Albrecht, understanding how they would work is tantamount to understanding how classical properties emerge from quantum systems.

* 1
* 2
* 3




Ultimately, the practical and cosmic questions may be one and the same. After all, Albrecht observes, the entire universe is fundamentally a quantum computer, and we ourselves are among the products of its computation.


Bibliography for: "Quantum mechanics gets real - future quantum mechanics theory and research - 75th Anniversary Supplement"

David Lindley "Quantum mechanics gets real - future quantum mechanics theory and research - 75th Anniversary Supplement". Science News. FindArticles.com. 16 Jun, 2009. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1200/is_n9_v151/ai_19217901/

* 1
* 2
* 3

Science News

View more issues:
Articles in March 1, 1997 issue of Science News

* Vitamin E helps - but don't overdose - antioxidants in male smokers and nonsmokers - Biochemistry - Brief Article
* Satellite makes solar wind count - Solar and Heliospheric Observatory satellite measurements of heavy elements in solar wind - Physics - Brief Article
by Corinne Wu
* Potent toxin complicates heart repair - IgM EndoCAb concentration in blood liked to risk of heart surgery complications - Brief Article
by Steve Sternberg
* Ewe again? Cloning from adult DNA - cloning sheep
by John Travis
* 51 Pegasi: a star without a planet? - a planet may not orbit the star as previously believed - Brief Article
by Ron Cowen
* Mud time line clarifies dinosaurs' demise - mud core supports theory that comet or meteor caused mass extinctions at the end of Cretaceous period - Brief Article
by Paul Smaglik
* Clockwork sex of coral reef algae - sexual reproduction among algae - Brief Article
by Christine Mlot
* Paternal smokers' cancer legacy - cancer risk among children of smoking fathers - Biochemistry - Brief Article
by Janet Raloff
* Earths beyond Earth - search for extraterrestrial life - 75th Anniversary Supplement
by Ron Cowen
* Biology's periodic table - Human Genome Projects - 75th Anniversary Supplement
by John Travis
* Letter from the editor - 'Science News' - 75th Anniversary Supplement - Editorial
by Julie Ann Miller
* A taxonomy of images - science photograph exhibition, National Museum of American History, Smithsonian Institution; Washington, D.C - 75th Anniversary Supplement - Brief Article
* Letter from the publisher - 'Science News' reaffirms its purpose to further the understanding of science among nonscientists - 75th Anniversary Supplement - Brief Article
by Thomas Bennett Bennett
* Atoms as the smallest quantum bits - proposal for using single atoms as bits in quantum computer - Physics - Brief Article
by Corinna Wu
* Nanotech: bigger isn't better - nanotechnology of the future - 75th Anniversary Supplement
by Corinna Wu
* Fractal past, fractal future - fractal research of the past and future - 75th Anniversary Supplement
by Ivars Peterson
* Minds meet in social whirl - future of psychology research - 75th Anniversary Supplement
by Bruce Bower
* From news wire to news weekly: 75 years of Science Service - 'Science News' history - 75th Anniversary Supplement
by Anna Maria Gillis
* Dr. Seekers' future imperfect: a sneak preview at what science will really look like in 25 years - humor - 75th Anniversary Supplement
by Bruce Bower
* Poesy - poem - 75th Anniversary Supplement
by Rebecca Carlsen
* A reflection while shaving on the finite speed of light - poem - 75th Anniversary Supplement
by Graham Walker
* They tell me a protein - poem - 75th Anniversary Supplement
by James R. Villiesse
* A symbol song - poem - 75th Anniversary Supplement
by Don Singalewitch
* Limerick - poem - 75th Anniversary Supplement
by David Goldstein
* Theory of the leisure clams - poem - 75th Anniversary Supplement
by G.P. Winship, Jr.
* Redeeming time - poem - 75th Anniversary Supplement
by Bill Stifler
* Encounter - poem - 75th Anniversary Supplement
by Laurence Levine
* Pinecones - poem - 75th Anniversary Supplement
by Judy White
* The Rockies - poem - 75th Anniversary Supplement
by Ernest A. Peterson
* Colorado stratification - poem - 75th Anniversary Supplement
by Ernest A. Peterson
* Paloma tomb - poem - 75th Anniversary Supplement
by Robert A. Benfer, Jr.
* Down's Syndrome settling Heather - poem - 75th Anniversary Supplement
by Mary Ann Chapman
* Quantum mechanics gets real - future quantum mechanics theory and research - 75th Anniversary Supplement
by David Lindley
* Future health, future choices - bioethics of the future - 75th Anniversary Supplement
by Kathleen Fackelmann
* The call of catastrophes - influence of mass extinction theory on future science - 75th Anniversary Supplement
by Richard Monastersy
* A new world of pollutant effects - future 'endocrine disrupter' research - 75th Anniversary Supplement
by Janet Raloff
* How things are: a suite for Lucretians - excerpt - poem - 75th Anniversary Supplement
by James Richardson
* Gene cuisine on the menu - future directions in genetic engineering - 75th Anniversary Supplement
by Steve Sternberg
* Haiku - poem - 75th Anniversary Supplement
by Kristi Betts
* At Princeton airport - poem - 75th Anniversary Supplement