Sensosphere: Revitalizing Common Sense?

Sorry, From the beginning of this manuskript I am going to use our Web 2.008, which imply the most possible liberalization throughout our communication systems.

In this way, Web 2.008 take us to the freedom to obviate any rule that any people could introduce, by any reason (b.e. editorial rules...), in the communication process.

The only rule of Web 2.008 is that don't exist any rule "per se", but for our concrete cultural systems nowadays (in scientific communication).

Any doubt PLOS ONE has subverted many of the parts of our general communication system in science, following a way that any 12 years old child would understand as plenty of logic.

After all the experiences, as PLOS ONE, in the liberalization of internet and social cmmunication systems, Web 2.008 may be considered as a logical (by)product of all this powerful knowledge process.

Web 2.008 is but one scientific "by-product" obtained in last years through the development of what U.N. call "Bio-Cultural Diversity", and we call SymBioDiversity.

After to participate in a very wide range of research and investigation-action groups, during almost 20 years, and with the demostrable proof of the great help, in our final endeavour, by "one-clip-system" we call "Google", Symbiodiversity has reached the "critical Mass", because, as main and relevant scientific discoveries, we can happily to add two scientific new terms and/or concepts: Global Science, and Sensosphere.

I think that, in certain cases, the managers of science communication systems can make one special exception, and publish this notice and/or article, just in this way. Unffortunately there are so many ciber-iliterated teachers, at a certain age, that we could increase in 99 % the learnong efficiency our education (in general) centers.

Sensosphere is going to be explained here, by a very actual and good example, that affects thousands of people in this world.

We are going here to compare, as two ideal models, the "Hc" or "hierarchycal classroom" and the "rR" or "rRound claSSroom". (Phoneticaly the double "R" sound help us from this moment to feel the strengh of our arguments, as one example of accoustic-phonetic symbiodomotics).

The paradox (and thus easy refutation) of our endeavour is that any "wild" guy not having past any university course (in "Hc" learning systems) , looks whole of logic our claiming about "rR"; and, from the reverse side, any many-year-experimented profesor in almost "Hc" system (or university studentes in their last years) , cannot understand our emphasis and urgency for change the actual dminant system (Hc) by and open mixed "rR+Hc" learnig sustem....