lunes, 27 de julio de 2009

GüayGüebyGüeb: The Phantastic History of a MetaSemanthic Disciplinarity Implosion

To connect Sciance with Magics or Phantasy nowdays, is not a matter of thinking about it possibility, but a matter of fact. Magics or Phantasy are no more a only virtual mind work, but actual science.

In the book Quantum Zoo yoy would find about that. If you add to Quantum Physics Mirrot Neurons, you would add Telepathy too. If you try to add a significant protion of all the new xxi century science, maybe you are a specialist or meso-specialist, and for thus you would probably be lost in what for many "common minds" is something not only "believle", but logical to accept and plenty of usefulnenn for all of us.

The fear in front of all the revolutionay developments of Quantum Physics, for example, by "The Guardians of the Temple", would evaporate since the moment that these "Clasic Scientist" recycle themselves alkimizing the change from "Guardians" to "Gardeners" (in a "permaculture" fashion).

Well, in Semantic Systems Biology, tha unity of information is a subject, an action (verb) and, for example, a place. The protein "X" is metabolised ("Y") in the liver ("X").

GuayGuebyGueb represents the print of a twenty year' cycle integrating knowledge from biology our to any knowledge possible to be arranged at biology from any other disciplline.

Thus it was (it is) a work about transdisciplinarity.

In this way we could say that our work sample covers any hind or piece of knowledge from whatever discipline. Thus we are in front of a whole set, where all knowledge may be rumiated for some use, and, in this way, any knowledge is actualy useful.

You know, in your life the important thing is to learn, with a general independence of the themes or things that you learn. Transdisciplinarity is more easy to explain when you see her as similar, or paralel, to "common sense". In your common life, you actualy act as a transdisciplinary mind, wole free tu use any piece of information in every instant of your life. By default, we could conclude, you, as living being, are a innate generalist.

The easy question of learning something in the "common world", for example in the street, becomes a terrific work in Academic Territories, where there are many "Privatized Lands", and you are still unable to learn many things that in other times (matriztic times) were open to any member of community.

So GuayGuebyGueb is a transdisciplinary wisdomscape, where we have been maximizing diversity, throughout metasemantic work.

Semantic is to one discipline what metasemantic is to transdicplinarity.

Semantic in this way mark the limits of that "Privatized Land" we call disciplines, or schools of thinking.

For transdisciplinary work your knowledge desires changes, actualy jumping, among different fields of knowledge plenty of freedom, and free of "The Barrier-Complex" any could suffers when her desires seems a little "acrobathic" for the people in the institution that is judging the acceptance or inacceptance of the search-proyect.

Writing that I remember Margulis and her problems with her "adopted-big-mother" Gaya!

GuayGuebyGueb, in the way to maximizing Transdisciplinary Information Density (TrInDens), permits at the same way that all the creativity derived from years of "Transdisciplinary Freedom of Thinking" express herself in the grewest way, with independence of that the resulting text becomes or not an easily reding text for anyone.

Of course our more repeated way to learn until now, in the shape of "lineal texts" makes us more difficult to understand all that "algarabía", that is, "general uncomprehension" derived of our own stenotopy, versus the eurioicy of more free transdisciplinary texts as many you would meet at GuayGuebyGueb.

Well, after to know the unity in Semantic System Biology, we are going to approach to Mi.Mi. (Minimum Info - Maximum Impact)

Mimi may be the three elemenys minimal unity of sematic system biology or any powerful meme by their own. Mimi is equal or less than the unity in Semantic system biology.

Through our game crossing memes of whatever field of knowledge among themselves, we have been going adding new terms, invented by us, to an easier descrition of a new action, a new semantic unity.

We would like to compare the innovation process in a very changing discipline as Genetics, with our own innovation rate in GuayGuebyGueb. Looking at the correspondent ratio of creation new terms in each of wisdomscapes: genetics and Guayguebygueb, for example.

We are trying to apply semantic system biology computer programs to standardize the semantic diversity wisdomscape in GuayGuebyGueb

Thanks and health!

3 comentarios:

  1. wonderful...absolute wonderful.Your words are music in my pussy
    and
    my
    heart.


    Lalu Juria

    ResponderEliminar
  2. http://mysticbanana.com/what-does-synchronicity-reveal-to-us-2.html

    Interesting so much.

    After reading many times Jung's preface of "I Chin", Synchronicity was more and more clear (and common sense) for me. In this text Jung compares western scientific causality principle with Chinese approach to reality.

    Complexity science shows us today that any result we observe has many, many causes. Western lineal science has tried always to reduce all these causes to only one, or several main causes, what means an oversimplification!

    Western (science) mind was programmed to automaticaly ask: Why? East, Chinese mind, on the contrary, try to observe deeply what happens, in order to take most information as possible.

    Western mind cut quickly the observation process passing quickly towards thoughts (and/or questions). East Chinese mind "stop the world" (according Castaneda term), for making a deeper and quiet observation, before passing to thoughts.

    In that way synchronicity equals space-time quality of any moment we live in our lives. All we live means a combination of facts in space-time, a combination of synchronicities.

    The role of "special synchronicities", those which have the power for being later remembered, is to be aware of our entanglement within physical world, our permanent connectivity within world, to prevent us which our "thoughts-machine", will take us outside of physical reality...

    Isn't?

    Very good the link about electron "non-local coherence", showing how "big science" (physics) is "on the top" of this sense of unity marking natural phylosophy along old history and cultures...

    namaste

    ResponderEliminar
  3. http://www.virtuescience.com/number-and-synchronicity.html

    http://twm.co.nz/hologram.html

    ResponderEliminar

yesyukan